The Aesthetic Appeal of Property

Art transforms spaces. Enter any room with a Monet or a Banksy, and you’ll feel the ambiance shift. Real estate developers have caught on, integrating art pieces as interior additions and foundational elements of their designs. Buildings are no longer just structures; they are canvasses.

In metropolitan hubs, massive murals grace condos or historic buildings. These murals do more than beautify; they increase the value of the property and its surrounding area.

Art Districts & Property Valuations

Take a moment and think about the hippest neighborhoods in major cities. The common thread? A vibrant arts scene. Regions that cultivate local artists and galleries see property values surge. It’s no accident that art districts become real estate hotspots.

New York’s SoHo, once an artists’ haven, has seen property values soar over the decades. Similarly, Miami’s Wynwood Walls turned a once-overlooked neighborhood into a sought-after real estate destination.

Personalized Spaces with Art

One of the major real estate trends influenced by art is personalizing spaces. Just as an art collector might scour the world for a piece that speaks to them, homebuyers look for properties that resonate on a personal level.

Companies in the real estate industry recognize this trend. A platform like housing portal, for instance, can help buyers find properties that can be transformed into personalized art-filled sanctuaries.

Sustainable Art & Green Building

Another intertwining trend is the rise of sustainable art and its influence on green building practices. Sculptures made from recycled materials or installations harnessing natural energy sources set the stage. In turn, real estate developers are embracing green technologies and sustainable building materials, reflecting modern art’s eco-conscious themes.

The Role of Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality

Art and technology have always enjoyed a symbiotic relationship, pushing boundaries and breaking barriers. With the rise of Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR), the real estate world is undergoing a revolution. Virtual home tours have become the norm, allowing prospective buyers to explore properties without setting foot in them. But what if this experience was infused with art?

Imagine stepping into a virtual property space adorned with digital art, allowing buyers to customize walls with paintings or sculptures in real time. This isn’t just a selling point; it’s an interactive experience that merges art’s aesthetic appeal with cutting-edge real estate technology.

Art-inspired Architectural Designs

Architects, like artists, draw inspiration from the world around them. The Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao by Frank Gehry and the Lotus Temple in New Delhi are not just buildings but pieces of art. The symbiosis between artistic thought and architectural design gives birth to buildings that defy the norm, pushing both real estate trends and architectural paradigms. Such structures become landmarks, increasing their prestige and value.

Experiential Real Estate: The Role of Art Installations

Art isn’t just static paintings or sculptures anymore. Interactive art installations, where the viewer becomes a part of the artwork, are becoming increasingly popular. Real estate developers are taking note. High-end residential communities or luxury commercial properties now boast interactive art installations, providing an experience rather than just a space.

Final Thoughts: Art – The Soul of Real Estate

The real estate canvas is vast, and the strokes of the artist bring it to life. From the colors chosen for a bedroom wall to the grand design of a skyscraper, art influences real estate in ways both tangible and intangible. As we witness this ever-evolving relationship, one thing is certain: art is not just about aesthetics; it’s an intrinsic part of our living spaces, adding depth, meaning, and value to the world of bricks and mortar.

The post Blending Brushes & Bricks: How Art Influences Real Estate Trends appeared first on Arto-Center.

By combining the thrill of gambling with the beauty of art, these virtual platforms offer players a unique and enriching experience. This article delves into the world of art in PayID casinos in Australia, exploring the rise of art-themed slot games, virtual art exhibitions, collaborations with artists, and the support for artistic initiatives, providing players with an unforgettable journey of both chance and aesthetics.

The Renaissance of Online Casinos in Australia

The internet has transformed numerous industries, and gambling is no exception. Traditional brick-and-mortar casinos have faced fierce competition from the emergence of online gambling platforms, offering players the convenience of playing from the comfort of their homes. As technology advanced, these online casinos evolved further to accommodate mobile gaming, providing users with access to a plethora of games on their smartphones and tablets.

Find your favorite quick withdrawal Australian PayID Casino: https://casino-payid.com

Art-Themed Pokies Games

Slot games have always been the backbone of the casino industry, both offline and online. To enhance player engagement and create unique experiences, PayID online casinos in Australia have delved into the realm of art-themed slot games. These games bring iconic works of art to life, incorporating famous paintings, sculptures, and artistic motifs as symbols on the reels.

Aussie casino players can now spin the wheels and enjoy visual masterpieces from renowned artists like Leonardo da Vinci, Vincent van Gogh, and Pablo Picasso. Each win is accompanied by a glimpse of the artwork, enriching the player’s experience beyond mere gambling. These art-themed slot games not only cater to art enthusiasts but also introduce new audiences to the beauty and significance of art.

Virtual Art Exhibitions and Galleries

With the advent of virtual reality (VR) technology, PayID online casinos have taken the art experience to the next level by hosting virtual art exhibitions and galleries. Players can now immerse themselves in digital art spaces, exploring famous museums and galleries from around the world, all from the comfort of their own homes.

Through VR headsets or even on their computer screens, users can walk through virtual halls, admire the paintings and sculptures on display, and learn about the history and context behind each artwork. This fusion of gaming and art appreciation offers a new dimension of entertainment, creating a bridge between two seemingly distinct worlds.

Art as a Source of Inspiration for Game Design

Art is more than just a visual feast; it also serves as a wellspring of inspiration for game design. PayID online casinos have recognized the potential of art to elevate their game offerings beyond simple mechanics. Game designers often draw inspiration from famous art movements, historical periods, or specific artists to craft visually stunning and thematically rich casino games.

For instance, a slot game based on the Art Nouveau movement might feature elegant, flowing lines and intricate floral patterns. On the other hand, a game inspired by surrealism could take players on a journey through dreamlike landscapes and mind-bending visuals. These artistic influences create captivating experiences that resonate with players on a deeper level, making the gameplay more engaging and memorable.

Collaborations with Artists

As the worlds of art and online casinos collide, collaborations between PayID platforms and artists have become more frequent. Online casinos have recognized the value of incorporating original artwork into their games and promotions. This has led to partnerships with contemporary artists, who design exclusive art pieces for specific games or events.

Such collaborations provide exposure to artists and introduce their work to a broader audience. Moreover, players get to experience unique and original content, adding to the allure of the casino platform. These partnerships benefit both the artistic community and the gaming industry, fostering a creative exchange that enhances the overall player experience.

Supporting Artistic Initiatives

PayID online casinos have not only integrated art into their platforms but have also taken initiatives to support artists and art-related causes. Some casinos allocate a portion of their profits to art foundations or cultural institutions, promoting the preservation and advancement of art worldwide. By linking gambling entertainment with philanthropy, these platforms contribute to the betterment of society and show their commitment to art beyond mere aesthetics.

The Future of Art in PayID Online Casinos

The convergence of art and PayID online casinos is still in its early stages, and the future promises even more exciting possibilities. Advancements in technology will likely lead to more immersive art experiences, such as augmented reality (AR) integration, enabling users to interact with virtual art in their physical surroundings.

Furthermore, collaborations with artists are expected to diversify, encompassing various art forms like music, literature, and performance art. The integration of NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens) may also offer new opportunities for artists and collectors to trade digital art within the casino environment, adding a layer of ownership and exclusivity to the experience.

Conclusion

The world of art in PayID online casinos is an intriguing fusion of chance and aesthetics. By incorporating art-themed slot games, hosting virtual art exhibitions, drawing inspiration from artistic movements, and collaborating with artists, these platforms provide a delightful and enriching experience for players.

Art not only enhances the visual appeal of casino games but also offers a profound connection to history, culture, and human creativity. As PayID online casinos continue to evolve and embrace artistic endeavors, they contribute to the growth of the art world while providing players with a truly immersive and unique gambling experience.

The post Discovering the World of Art in PayID Online Casinos appeared first on Arto-Center.

Art versus artifact

The word “art” is derived from the Latin ars, which originally meant “skill” or “craft.” These meanings are still primary in other English words derived from ars, such as “artifact” (a thing made by human skill) and “artisan” (a person skilled at making things). The meanings of “art” and “artist,” however, are not so straightforward. We understand art as involving more than just skilled craftsmanship. What exactly distinguishes a work of art from an artifact, or an artist from an artisan?

When asked this question, students typically come up with several ideas. One is beauty. Much art is visually striking, and in the 18th, 19th and early 20th centuries, the analysis of aesthetic qualities was indeed central in art history. During this time, art that imitated ancient Greek and Roman art (the art of classical antiquity), was considered to embody a timeless perfection. Art historians focused on the so-called fine arts—painting, sculpture, and architecture—analyzing the virtues of their forms. Over the past century and a half, however, both art and art history have evolved radically.

Artists turned away from the classical tradition, embracing new media and aesthetic ideals, and art historians shifted their focus from the analysis of art’s formal beauty to interpretation of its cultural meaning. Today we understand beauty as subjective—a cultural construct that varies across time and space. While most art continues to be primarily visual, and visual analysis is still a fundamental tool used by art historians, beauty itself is no longer considered an essential attribute of art.

A second common answer to the question of what distinguishes art emphasizes originality, creativity, and imagination. This reflects a modern understanding of art as a manifestation of the ingenuity of the artist. This idea, however, originated five hundred years ago in Renaissance Europe, and is not directly applicable to many of the works studied by art historians. For example, in the case of ancient Egyptian art or Byzantine icons, the preservation of tradition was more valued than innovation. While the idea of ingenuity is certainly important in the history of art, it is not a universal attribute of the works studied by art historians.

All this might lead one to conclude that definitions of art, like those of beauty, are subjective and unstable. One solution to this dilemma is to propose that art is distinguished primarily by its visual agency, that is, by its ability to captivate viewers. Artifacts may be interesting, but art, I suggest, has the potential to move us—emotionally, intellectually, or otherwise. It may do this through its visual characteristics (scale, composition, color, etc.), expression of ideas, craftsmanship, ingenuity, rarity, or some combination of these or other qualities. How art engages varies, but in some manner, art takes us beyond the everyday and ordinary experience. The greatest examples attest to the extremes of human ambition, skill, imagination, perception, and feeling. As such, art prompts us to reflect on fundamental aspects of what it is to be human. Any artifact, as a product of human skill, might provide insight into the human condition. But art, in moving beyond the commonplace, has the potential to do so in more profound ways. Art, then, is perhaps best understood as a special class of artifact, exceptional in its ability to make us think and feel through visual experience.

History: Making Sense of the Past

Like definitions of art and beauty, ideas about history have changed over time. It might seem that writing history should be straightforward—it’s all based on facts, isn’t it? In theory, yes, but the evidence surviving from the past is vast, fragmentary, and messy. Historians must make decisions about what to include and exclude, how to organize the material, and what to say about it. In doing so, they create narratives that explain the past in ways that make sense in the present. Inevitably, as the present changes, these narratives are updated, rewritten, or discarded altogether and replaced with new ones. All history, then, is subjective—as much a product of the time and place it was written as of the evidence from the past that it interprets.

The discipline of art history developed in Europe during the colonial period (roughly the 15th to the mid-20th century). Early art historians emphasized the European tradition, celebrating its Greek and Roman origins and the ideals of academic art. By the mid-20th century, a standard narrative for “Western art” was established that traced its development from the prehistoric, ancient, and medieval Mediterranean to modern Europe and the United States. Art from the rest of the world, labeled “non-Western art,” was typically treated only marginally and from a colonialist perspective.

The immense sociocultural changes that took place in the 20th century led art historians to amend these narratives. Accounts of Western art that once featured only white males were revised to include artists of color and women. The traditional focus on painting, sculpture, and architecture was expanded to include so-called minor arts such as ceramics and textiles and contemporary media such as video and performance art. Interest in non-Western art increased, accelerating dramatically in recent years.

Today, the biggest social development facing art history is globalism. As our world becomes increasingly interconnected, familiarity with different cultures and facility with diversity are essential. Art history, as the story of exceptional artifacts from a broad range of cultures, has a role to play in developing these skills. Now art historians ponder and debate how to reconcile the discipline’s European intellectual origins and its problematic colonialist legacy with contemporary multiculturalism and how to write art history in a global era.

Smarthistory’s videos and articles reflect this history of art history. Since the site was originally created to support a course in Western art and history, the content initially focused on the most celebrated works of the Western canon. With the key periods and civilizations of this tradition now well-represented and a growing number of scholars contributing, the range of objects and topics has increased in recent years. Most importantly, substantial coverage of world traditions outside the West has been added. As the site continues to expand, the works and perspectives presented will evolve in step with contemporary trends in art history. In fact, as innovators in the use of digital media and the internet to create, disseminate, and interrogate art historical knowledge, Smarthistory and its users have the potential to help shape the future of the discipline.

The post What is art history and where is it going? appeared first on Arto-Center.

The first Greek statues were made during the Archaic Age (750 B.C. to 500 B.C.). They had the same rigidity, stiff posture and stylized walking gait as their counterparts in Egypt. Their left arm was forward and the fist were clenched like most Egyptian standing figures. The first advancement the Greeks made was creating a free standing statue. Egyptian statues were either seated or shown emerging from a slab of stone which acted to hold the figure up.

Early statues called “ kouroi” were often sensuous and monumental nude statues and often featured a mysterious Mona Lisa smile. “Kouros” and “ kore” are the male and female terms for “young person.” Art historian Andre Stewart told National Geographic, kouroi “were intended be erotic.” The subjects were usually young, male and had beautiful bodies. The largest known kouri are 16 feet high and made from marble. Before kouri the largest known sculpture in Greece were small bronzes.

Adam Masterman, an art teacher, wrote in Quora.com: The Archaic period (700-490 B.C.) represents the Greek response to seeing the awesome and impressive monumental sculptures of ancient Egypt. Archaic sculptures are relatively realistic, but very stiff and formal. They often stand in perfectly symmetrical poses, and have an imposing bulk to their proportions. They tend to feel more like archetypes than individuals, monuments rather than portraits.”

According to the Canadian Museum of History: “Life-sized or larger stone sculptures were not produced in Greece before 650 B.C. It was around that time that the Egyptian pharaoh Psammetichos allowed two groups of Greeks (Ionians and Carians) to settle along the banks of the Nile River. The Greeks learned the art of large stone carving from the Egyptians although they used the limestone and marble available in Greece, not the harder porphyry and granodiorite favoured by the Egyptians. The Egyptian “look and feel” was initially adopted by the Greeks but they were not content for long to simply produce sculptures in a style that had served the East for many generations. Within a couple of centuries they had evolved their distinctive Greek approach and abandoned the Egyptian formula.

Classical Greek Sculpture

Classical Greek Sculpture (500B.C. to 323 B.C.) was less rigid than sculptures from the Archaic period. Works featured flexed knees, turned heads, and contemplative expressions that were regarded as attempts to suggest motion, thoughts and naturalism. As time went on more and more anatomical features emerged, the bodies became more relaxed, muscular, sensual and less rigid, hair falls more naturally, motion was conveyed, clothing seems softer and more cloth-like facial expression convey more emotion and movement and action and are more realistically conveyed. A “middle distance” gaze of the statue’s eyes was greatly admired.

As Greek art developed and the sculptors evolved from skilled craftsmen into artists, the buttocks on their creations became more rounded, the ears took on more of a three-dimensional shape, collarbones were more pronounced, and, according to Boorstin, the lachrymal caruncle of the eyes was revealed for the first time. “The whole figure becomes more alive,” he says, “as the stance becomes relaxed and rigid symmetry and posture disappears…Their favored sculptural material was bronze…Bronze freed the sculptor to uplift limbs and tempted him to new postures.” [Source: “The Creators” by Daniel Boorstin,μ]

Adam Masterman wrote in Quora.com: “The Classical period (480-323 B.C.) was defined by a marked increase in naturalism, which means that the sculptures started looking more like real people in real poses. This period shows the first examples of contrapposto, which is where the weight is shifted to one leg (which is how humans tend to stand). Contrapposto is more realistic, and it’s also more visually dynamic; it creates a subtle s-shape to the torso that is very common and recognizable in Classical sculpture. These figures are still very idealized, but with more anatomical subtlety and muscular definition, and a broadening range of poses.”

Describing a classical Nike, or Victory, from the Acropolis Museum Holland Cotter wrote in the New York Times: “Bending to untie her sandal, the intricate, looping folds of her drapery creating a linear pattern that reveals rather than hides the swelling contours of her torso. Her sensuality stands in dramatic contrast to a stele from the Metropolitan’s own collection, in which a mournful looking little girl holds two pet doves, one of which gently touches her mouth with its beak.” [Source: Holland Cotter, New York Times, March 12, 1993]

On some funerary sculptures, some of which may have been carved by artists who worked on the Parthenon, Cotter wrote in the New York Times: “Here the figures are neither gods nor heroes but human beings engaged in the intimate activities of their lives. On one memorial, a husband and wife gaze confidingly at each other; on another, the well-known “Grave Stele of Hegeso,” a wealthy woman regretfully admires her jewels, carried in a box by her servant. The presence of the servant… is of much interest here. Notably smaller than her seated mistress, anonymous, proferring wealth that is not hers, surely she has something pertinent to say about what democracy… actually meant in the Greece of the fifth century B.C. “Golden Age,” a society, after all, that held a large population of slaves and extended full citizenship only to men.

Polyclitus and Praxiteles

Polyclitus was one of Greece’s most famous sculptures. According to an often repeated tale he once made two statues at the same time. One was made according to his principals of art and another he modified according the wishes of people who observed it. When the two were finally unveiled everyone marveled at one of the statues and laughed at the other. Thereupon Plyclitus said: “But the one of which you find fault with, you made yourselves; while he one you marvel at, I made.” [Source: “The Creators” by Daniel Boorstin,μ]

Polyclitus produced wonderful sculptures of athletes. A New York Times critic Grace Gluek wrote his “brilliance is evident on the rhythmic play between the torso and the thorax, each tilting slightly in the opposite directions, and in the lifelike separation of the feet that gives the otherwise placid statue a sense of movement.”

Praxiteles did some of the most wonderful sculptures in Olympia and is one of the few artists we know by name who has produced works that exist today; the sensuous “ Aphrodite of the Cnidians” and classic “ Hermes “ . Scopas was the name of another great Greek sculptor.

On a famous story about Praxiteles, Pausanias wrote in “Description of Greece”, Book I: Attica (A.D. 160): “ Leading from the prytaneum is a road called Tripods. The place takes its name from the shrines, large enough to hold the tripods which stand upon them, of bronze, but containing very remarkable works of art, including a Satyr, of which Praxiteles is said to have been very proud. Phryne once asked of him the most beautiful of his works, and the story goes that lover-like he agreed to give it, but refused to say which he thought the most beautiful. So a slave of Phryne rushed in saying that a fire had broken out in the studio of Praxiteles, and the greater number of his works were lost, though not all were destroyed. Praxiteles at once started to rush through the door crying that his labour was all wasted if indeed the flames had caught his Satyr and his Love. But Phryne bade him stay and be of good courage, for he had suffered no grievous loss, but had been trapped into confessing which were the most beautiful of his works. So Phryne chose the statue of Love; while a Satyr is in the temple of Dionysus hard by, a boy holding out a cup.” [Source: Pausanias, “Description of Greece,” with an English Translation by W.H.S. Jones, Litt.D. in 4 Volumes. Volume 1.Attica and Cornith, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press; London, William Heinemann Ltd., 1918]

The post HISTORY OF ANCIENT GREEK SCULPTURE appeared first on Arto-Center.